========================================
Fri, 01 Nov 2024 10:40:27 -0700
<vg33qb$3bdr8$***@dont-email.me>
Robert <***@no.way> wrote:
========================================
Post by RobertPost by In the Name of JesusThere is only One God, Robert, only ever been One God. It was explained,
God placed separation in Himself, both sides of the veil...God.
One as in Unity.
One as in essence and Being, not just relational unity. There are not
three God Beiungs who united into one godhead. There is only one
eternally self-existing Being who is God.
Post by RobertThe Godhead. If there were only one being called God,
Note there. He says "if there were only one being called God". Is he not
claiming there are three God Beings? Is he not denying that there is
only one God Being? He's evidently claiming that there are three God
Beings who are simply united together.
Isaiah 45:5-6 - "I am the Lord, and there is no other, besides me there
is no God; I equip you, though you do not know me, that people may know,
from the rising of the sun and from the west, that there is none besides
me; I am the Lord, and there is no other" (Isaiah 45:5-6, ESV).
Isaiah 44:6 - "Thus says the Lord, the King of Israel and his Redeemer,
the Lord of hosts: 'I am the first and I am the last; besides me there
is no god'" (Isaiah 44:6, ESV).
Deuteronomy 4:35 - "To you it was shown, that you might know that the
Lord is God; there is no other besides him" (Deuteronomy 4:35, ESV).
Isaiah 43:10 - "'You are my witnesses,' declares the Lord, 'and my
servant whom I have chosen, that you may know and believe me and
understand that I am he. Before me no god was formed, nor shall there be
any after me'" (Isaiah 43:10, ESV).
Post by Robertand no ‘us’ as
Three persons. 1 God Being.
Post by Robertis stated in the Bible, then God could not keep a secret from
himself, such as when it is time for Christ to come for his body of
believers.
• You're making arguments from your own reasoning here, rather than from
Scripture. It doesn't seem reasonable to you. If you don't understand
it, therefore, it can't be right. Since God's ways are unsearchable
(Romans 11:33), and you require that he does not exceed your
understanding or ability to explain, you will always end up with a god
you invented, who is small enough for you to comprehend. This is
idolatry. --Not only because you worship a comprehensible God who does
not exceed your reason, but because you claim there are three God
Beings, yet God said there is only one and none beside Him.
• Regarding His omniscience, Philippians 2 specifically shows Christ
emptied Himself of His divine rights to become a man. He willingly set
aside His independent access to omniscience.
Post by RobertIt would also mean that Jesus was a ventriloquist and threw his
voice into the clouds to say, “this is my well beloved Son, hear ye him”
which is contrary to his statements regarding “that I can do nothing of
myself” and also his statements regarding defending himself and proving
himself as God before the men of his time.
Three distinct persons, only one God Being. But no, Robert has to have a
God that can be fully explained, and fit in the palm of his hand, so He
denies there is only one God Being.
Post by Robert“I can of mine own self do nothing: as I hear, I judge: and my judgment is
just; because I seek not mine own will, but the will of the Father which hath
sent me. If I bear witness of myself, my witness is not true. There is
another that beareth witness of me; and I know that the witness which he
witnesseth of me is true.” (Jhn 5:30-32, KJV)
Idem.
Post by RobertPost by In the Name of JesusPost by RobertWhy didn’t Jesus tell John the Baptist about his being anointed by the
Holy Spirit of God the Father, face to face if he was the Heavenly Father?
Have you the exhaustive mind of God?
As was said, you can't bring God down to a material calculation. "One
Spirit. Mankind naturally looks at God and tries to reason Him into
physical terms. It won't and can't work."
That is correct. He exceeds human comprehension (Romans 11:33).
Post by RobertPost by In the Name of JesusThis is a preeminent theme in the verse I have been quoting lately...
Pro 3:5 Trust in the LORD with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine
own understanding.
If you could bring down God to a mental concept capable of being
captured by the human mind, it wouldn't be of faith.
Correct.
Post by RobertYet as a believer this is true,... “But the natural man receiveth not the
things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can
he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. But he that is
spiritual judgeth all things, yet he himself is judged of no man. For who
hath known the mind of the Lord, that he may instruct him? But we have the
mind of Christ.” (1Co 2:14-16, KJV)
This addresses all that you stated above, but the correct way, which is the
Post by In the Name of Jesusreality of the believer in Jesus the Christ.
Note from 1 Corinthians 2: "the things freely given us by God".
"Now we have received not the spirit of the world, but the Spirit who is
from God, that we might understand the things freely given us by God" (1
Corinthians 2:12, ESV).
This doesn't mean the Spirit imparts everything there is to know about
God to the mind of the believer. It means He imparts a deep
understanding of the things "freely given us by God". There are certain
things God has given us to know about Him. The understanding we receive
applies to those things, not to everything there is to know. You would
literally explode with overload if you tried to fully comprehend God.
And if you think you wouldn't, you worship a finite God of your own
invention.
“Oh, the depth of the riches and wisdom and knowledge of God! How
unsearchable are his judgments and how inscrutable his ways!” (Romans
11:33, ESV)
Post by RobertPost by In the Name of JesusPost by RobertAnd If God the Father gave us His Glory, His power, to be born as Jesus, who
then was the ruler of ALL Heaven?
As above.
Is there only One God? And is the Lord Jesus God? I would hope you would
say yes to both questions.
If I did I would not be true to the word of God.
Liar. There is only a single, solitary God Being. To contend otherwise
is to promote idolatry. Three distinct persons, one God. You struggle
with that because you insist that God must not exceed your comprehension.
Post by RobertThey are ‘as one’.
Notice that he is the one who now pretends to quote when he's actually
just citing his own words, not Scripture. The Bible does not God is "as"
one, but just that He is "one". There is no other God beside Him. You
promote idolatry.
Post by RobertUnified. Like a husband and wife are ‘one’.
Again, you try to reduce God to something you can understand and can
explain. You are trying to confuse relational unity with singularity of
essence or Being. There is only One God Being, not three united God
beings. To contend otherwise is to promote idolatry.
Post by RobertAnd that is what the word of
God speaks to their relationship,
Now you admit you're talking about the relationship of the three
persons, not the essence or Being. You're trying to confuse relationship
with essence.
Post by Robertyet the Husband is the one in authority or
the ‘head’ of the family. And Yes, this is established by God. It is
indeed His understanding and specified as such.
This is relational unity, not unity of Being. The Father, Son, and
Spirit have relational unity, but they also have singularity of essence.
There is only one single, solitary Being in existence, who is God. There
are not three relationally united God Beings. You promote idolatry.
Post by RobertPost by In the Name of JesusThey are One Spirit, One Lord, and One God, but God placed separation in
Himself to allow us to become One with Him. Think of the Red Sea
parting, One Sea, but God opened the way for the Israelites, but at no
point did it ever change from being One Red Sea.
That is what you call human understanding, for which you criticize me if I do
so.
Notice how quickly and easily you recognize human understanding when
someone else uses it, but you are completely blind to your own human
understanding and reasoning in this matter.
• You've said "as One", when the Bible says "one". That's your reasoning
and understanding, not what Scripture reveals.
• You've tried to limit God's Being to what you understand about human
relationships.
• You've tried to claim to the effect that God promised you all
knowledge about Himself, when it actually says knowledge about the
"things" that God freely gives us to understand.
• Most idolatrously, you appear to flat out claim there is not only a
single God Being, but three God Beings who are simply relationallly
united. That's your reasoning, not what the Bible teaches.
Post by RobertAnd to cover what you missed here, there was dry land between the two,
thus separating the waters. The barrier was in place as real and fixed as if
their was a mountain separating the two waters.
Post by In the Name of JesusPost by RobertWhy then did Jesus, after he was resurrected tell Mary I go to see My God
and Your God?
You are too caught up in the materialism, in the idea you can contain
God in your mind.
That statement is correct.
Yes, entirely.
Post by RobertYou are trying to rationalize with your mind, things that are
spiritual, and then have confusion because you are unfamiliar with the things
of the spirit, which all men are are limited because we see through a glass
darkly.
No. It's you in this case. See above.
Post by Robert“Jesus saith unto her, Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my
Father: but go to my brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto my Father,
and your Father; and to my God, and your God.” (Jhn 20:17, KJV)
That scripture is as true now as the last time it was pointed out to you.
Yes. And it doesn't teach what you're claiming. It appears you believe
in three God Beings who are simply relationally united like a husband
and wife. The Bible says there is only one God Being, and none beside
Him. There are not three God Beings. Only one.
Post by RobertPost by In the Name of JesusThe Red Sea was simply coming back together.
It was rejoined and in doing so it judged the Egyptians.
Like Jesus, it was the path, the way, Through which Salvation to the
Israelites was provided, yet many which were saved returned to their old ways
and so they died, never receiving the Promised Land. Jesus is also the one
who judges all men. As those people fell, that were saved Via doubt and
disbelief, so it is with many in the church today, and for that reason Jesus
said, ...
Luk 21:34 (KJV) And take heed to yourselves, lest at any time your hearts be
overcharged with surfeiting, and drunkenness, and cares of this life, and
sothat day come upon you unawares.
Luk 21:35 (KJV) For as a snare shall it come on all them that dwell on the
face of the whole earth.
Luk 21:36 (KJV) Watch ye therefore, and pray always, that ye may be accounted
worthy to escape all these things that shall come to pass, and to stand
before the Son of man.
Post by In the Name of JesusPost by RobertWho was the ‘US’, in “let us make man in ‘our’ image?
One God.
Correct.
Post by RobertPost by In the Name of JesusYou are trying to capture God in material terms; you can't, it
is impossible because He is more than material terms. Why do you need
the scriptures to mean what you want them to mean to walk with God?
In this case, that is correct.
Post by RobertGen 1:26 (KJV) And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our
likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the
fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every
creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.
Notice the “ in and our ” statements that Jesus made. Not man, Did God
really not mean to say that? Is that what you are suggesting?
Three persons, one Being. Not three God Beings who are but relationally
united.
Post by RobertPerhaps this is a good time to again say, what does the word God mean, how
many meanings are there to the word. And when does it mean Master, Elohim,
YHWH, Satan, a JUDGE, At one time Elohim was used loosely in a generic sense
by man who worshipped what they called gods and called them Elohim. This is a
topic you should study.
There are things about God which we only know of from the Old Testament
to be sure. But the New Testament gives us the fuller picture and the
more detailed information on God's nature. Any time someone flees from
New Testament Revelation to Old Testament revelation to make a case
about God which He cannot make from the more progressive revelation of
the New Testament, it is a red flag pointing to error. The fact you're
trying to make your case from the Old Testament, rather than the light
of the New Testament, is a sign that you're trying to read your own
theology about God into the Bible, contrary to what the New Testament says.
Post by RobertPost by In the Name of JesusWas there two Gods in the garden with Adam and Eve?
There was the God of this earth, Who walked with them, and there was also the
Heavenly Father, the “Ancient One” as written in the OT. But it was only
Jesus who walked with them.
[...]
Post by RobertPost by In the Name of JesusPost by RobertIs it necessary that the Holy Spirit repeat all that resides in Scripture to
your in order for you to believe them?
Perhaps you don't, as yet, have the understanding the Lord would have
you have?
If you knew all things then there would be nothing new to reveal to you.
• If you could see everything, there would be nothing left to show you.
• If you understood every language, there would be nothing you couldn’t
translate.
• If you had already arrived everywhere, there would be nowhere left to go.
• If you remembered everything, there would be nothing you could forget.
• If you held every answer, there would be no questions left to ask.
There. Was that self-evident enough for you?
Instead of making a "god" out of your words, how about I acknowledge the
Bible as God's word (2 Timothy 3:15-16)?
Post by RobertPost by In the Name of JesusPost by Robertwhy not read it for what its,
and for the reasons that it gives, and do as Jesus did, show his disciples
the truth of scriptures, and where he was to be found in them.
Which is exactly what I've been saying all along. The Scriptures point
to Jesus (John 5:39; Luke 24:27), and they are the vehicle of imparting
faith in Jesus (Romans 1:16; 10:17; John 20:30-31; 1 Corinthians
15:1-4). You don't come to saving faith in Jesus, apart from God's word.
Post by RobertPost by In the Name of JesusThere is so much more to say but I have already said, many times, enough
for you to grasp and understand if you were willing.
You are not interacting with me as you see me, Robert, you are
interacting with the Lord.
It depends on how you mean that. Matthew 25:40 shows that Jesus takes it
personally how others treat His people. In helping or not helping Jesus'
people, they are doing it to Jesus. But this is not to be confused with
the idea that whatever you happen to do or say is equivalent to
interacting with the Lord Himself.
Post by RobertSorry Bubba, but I have direct access to the Lord. The things I have been
speaking of here, He showed me as well as gave me the understandings of it.
That is not to say that the Lord does not speak to others via his servants,
for he does. In those cases it is obvious for the Spirit of the Father bears
witness within ones heart which the scriptures also says and bears witness
to.
There are a number of instances above, where you both modified (changed
"one" to "as one"), and contradicted what Scripture says (the idea there
are three eternally self-existent "Gods", who are united only in
relationship, not divine essence). In that you clearly contradict what
the Bible teaches. There is only a single, solitary being who is God.
Post by RobertPost by In the Name of JesusThat is what Paul was saying when he said, "Be followers of me.”
The rest of that verse says “even as I also of Christ” IOW Follow or
imitate Christ.
[...]
Post by RobertPost by In the Name of JesusPaul was merely a vessel; all the glory is the Lord's.
Correct.
Post by RobertI am aware of how God speaks and how he confirms His words.
Many a cult leader speaks exactly as you have spoken, with many dying as a
direct result of that.
Paul would never mock God by making fun of the gift of
tongues.
Paul would never mock God by faking tongues like Charismatics do.
Post by RobertNor would he use any foul language. By His fruits we knew him and by
your fruits you likewise are known.
Yet you have no problem opposing and trying to poison people's minds
against accurate proclamations of the gospel in here, if someone other
than you is making them. Filthy communication is a manifestation of our
sin nature, but so is bitter envy that opposes those who promote the
truth, out of demonically inspired envy (James 3:14-15;
https://christrose.news/demonic-wisdom).
Post by RobertPost by In the Name of JesusPost by RobertThe Lord Jesus Christ was always and is always perfect; only God is the
source of perfection.
Yet the words Jesus spoke were the words of His Father, he stated clearly
that these were not His own personal words. Yes, Jesus was sinless. From
birth and throughout his life. At his death he became ’sin’ for us.
If you mean He turned dirty then you have said a very bad thing. For
one, He is always was, is, and will be forever what He has always been.
Or to say it another way, a spotless lamb doesn't become spotted when it
is being slaughtered for the sins of slaughters.
"If".
Post by RobertPost by In the Name of JesusPost by RobertHim
who knew no sin, in order to pay the price, the ransom price for all who
will believe.
“For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be
made the righteousness of God in him.” (2Co 5:21, KJV)
It means He was was "made" to be sin for us, not that he was made sin.
If I say to the judge, I will take the death penalty for that man's
murder, that does not make my personhood a murderer. Yes, I pay the
price for the sin, but that does not make me a murderer!
Actually the words “to be” was not part of that scripture, it was
infected for clarities sake. It really said "He was made sin for us."
Post by In the Name of JesusYou said yourself, "Jesus was sinless." He was, is, and always will be.
The scripture said “who knew no sin” His Father made him sin IOW placed
all the sins of mankind upon Him for which Jesus paid the price for all of
us. Jesus knew full well what was going to happen as he made clear in the
garden of Gethsemane when He asked his Father, if it be possible, take this
cup away from me. He knew of the intense misery that he was about to bear.
Yes. He was without sin, because of the life he lived. He lived as man,
subject to all the temptations of men, yet he fulfilled all the Law, and was
sinless. As unspotted as a sacrificial lamb. For that reason hell could not
contain him. And YES the sin he bore took him to the deepest part of hell.
Christ fully paid our sin debt by dying in our place ("it is finished"),
not by suffering in Gehenna. However (in case James has to be
listening), this does not mean that a person can simply die physically
to atone for his sins. A human death is of finite value. Our sins are
against an infinite God. Eternal torment in the lake of fire is the
destiny of those who reject Christ's propitiating atonement for their sins.
As McGee notes
"Now that he ascended, what is it but that he also descended first into
the lower parts of the earth?" (Eph 4:9, KJV)
The logical explanation of these verses is that since Christ ascended,
He must have of necessity descended at some previous period. Some see
only the Incarnation in this. The early church fathers saw in it the
work of Christ in bringing the Old Testament saints out of paradise up
to the throne of God. We are told that He descended into hell. It is not
necessary, however, to assume that He entered into some form of
suffering after His death. His incarnation and death were His
humiliation and descent, and they were adequate to bring the redeemed of
the Old Testament into the presence of God. That would explain His
fullness here. “He that descended is the same also that ascended up far
above all heavens, that he might fill all things.” I recognize, however,
that there are other interpretations (McGee Ephesians 4:9).
Post by RobertBut then all these things you should know and be aware of before I even
brought them to you from the scriptures. Eh?
Post by In the Name of JesusPost by RobertThink about it, throughout the history of Man a Lamb was sacrificed for sin.
Not just any lamb, but one that was perfect and without a flaw. The prime of
the prime.
And His character, His being did not change.
He died as man does, not God.
Post by In the Name of JesusPost by RobertJesus was the “lamb of God that taketh away all the sin”
Amen. Spotless, pure, holy, and not act of man ever made Him otherwise.
Post by Robert“The next day John seeth Jesus coming unto him, and saith, Behold the Lamb
of God, which taketh away the sin of the world.” (Jhn 1:29, KJV)
How did He do that?
Post by RobertWhy are you beholden to the doctrine of the trinity as propagated by the RCC?
Don't go off the reservation, Robert, if you do, it'll end the discussion.
Fine then I will stop it here. the Bible does not teach the trinity. Never
did. It is a doctrine of men.
The Bible doesn't say the word "trinity". It does in fact teach that
there is only one God Being, but that three distinct persons are God.
They are one not in the mere sense of relational unity, but in divine
essence. There are not three God Beings who are simply united by
relationship or purpose. They are a single, solitary God Being--your
inability to comprehend that not withstanding.
Post by RobertPost by In the Name of JesusPost by RobertPost by RobertHow can one person be three different persons? Are they a shape shifter?
One Spirit. Remember, post the fall the only reason we got a Son of God
in the flesh is because God had to place separation in Himself (make a
way) in order to bring His children back to and into Him.
Jesus was not born without a spirit. Man was created with a body soul and
spirit. We all propagated after our own kind. Which we were created to do and
be. We are to worship God the Father and pray to Him. Not to Jesus. (Which is
hard to do solely, as Jesus Christ was our redeemer.) Yet we are commanded to
do so, and Jesus gave us the reasoning behind that in the scripture.
There is no problem if you believe in One God.
I always pray to the Lord because...that is the way God chose to
identify and identifies with us; God with us. Thomas didn't have a
problem being in obeisance to the Lord Jesus because He SAW God before
Him, the One God. It is not about material terms, but spiritual reality.
Yes. There is only a solitary Being who is God. Yet there are three
distinct persons (Father, Son, and Spirit). The Father is not the Son or
Holy Spirit. The Son (although He owns the title of Everlasting Father
which is a title of authority for the king) is not the Father or Spirit.
The Spirit is not the Father or Son. All three, however, are God
individually. Yet there is only one God Being. Whether that makes sense
to a finite creature does not determine whether or not it is true.
Post by RobertPost by In the Name of JesusBut if you want to see with the eyes of facts and bible doctrine
(ChristRose modus operandi) you won't be able to see with the eyes of
faith, which incidentally, is the only way to see God.
Lies. If you think we get a more accurate understanding of God from what
you say about God than what God's word says about God, you are a liar
and deceiver.
Post by RobertPost by In the Name of JesusPost by RobertMankind is not the children of God, for they follow another.
Post by RobertThree can be a Godhead, a corporate entity in todays terms, and they can all
be at one in total agreement, yet one is the final authority, as a husband is
to the man and woman being one as ordained by God. They are one in Christ as
he is in the Heavenly Father.
You can't contain God in physical terms or material terms; if you could,
you would be greater than God.
Of course not. Only a fool would declare that he could.
It is not what a man declares in his material world, but what he
does...in the Spirit.
Post by RobertHe is One Spirit; Father and Son are God, One and the Same, One Holy
Spirit. God is everywhere and in everything; the Father as we see Him
and the Son as we see Him; both are God. There is only One God.
Cam you define nor understand ‘one’ as spoken in the scriptures.
?
Robert idiotically and idolatrously promotes the idea that three God
Beings exist, and are simply united in a relationship. There is only one
God Being and essence, not two or three. Robert promotes ignorance and
idolatry.
Post by RobertPost by In the Name of JesusPost by RobertPost by RobertPost by Christ RoseBelievers become one with Christ and with other believers, not by
merging into the essence of God, but by being brought into intimate
fellowship with Him. This union is relational and covenantal, reflecting
harmony, shared purpose, and participation in God’s life through Christ.
It fulfills Jesus’ prayer in John 17:21: "that they may all be one, just
as You, Father, are in Me, and I in You, that they also may be in Us."
“Herein is our love made perfect, that we may have boldness in the day of
judgment: because as he is, so are we in this world.” (1Jn 4:17, KJV)
Physically? No. Spiritually? Yes. Is not the Born Again Man born of the
Heavenly Father?
I stated something the other day which surprised me, and I am yet to
revisit and meditate further on.
Post by RobertIn short, believers do not BECOME The Eternally Self-existing GOD
when > they are made one in Christ.
And my reply to our rosie Rosie...
Yes, they do. Family is family and is eternal self-existent Oneness in
and of God.
And this was explained to me by the Holy Spirit...
"No one in heaven is better (or higher) than what makes it heaven. Such
is the love of God."
You see, it is about the nature and glory of God. He is a "withhold
nothing" God whose love is all inclusive.
Eph 3:20 Now unto him that is able to do exceeding abundantly above all
that we ask or think, according to the power that worketh in us,
The power of what?
The Holy Spirt, who dwells within the Spirit of Born Again Man.
Now, what would you think if I said to you, since a son is immersed (in
the vine) in God that he is actually the full expression of the Holy
Spirit since the Lord Jesus is his Lord?
I'd say you're approaching Chung-hood. You suffer from the delusion that
every idea that pops into your head is the Holy Spirit Himself speaking.
Then you turn around and try to kill people's faith in God's actual
word, calling it idolatry to base your faith on what God Himself said,
because it interferes with the delusion that your words are God's words.
Post by RobertPost by In the Name of JesusHere you go...
1Jn_4:17 Herein is our love made perfect, that we may have boldness in
the day of judgment: because as he is, so are we in this world.
"Family is family and is eternal self-existent Oneness in and of God.
Boldness! How can a sinner have boldness?
He can't.
Liar. He can have boldness by confessing His sin and being forgiven and
cleansed of it (1 John 1:8-2:2).
Post by RobertPost by In the Name of JesusPost by RobertYou need to have faith in God and lean not on your own sinner
understanding. You are your own very bad enemy.
As I told you before, and recently, I learned that and started practicing
that many decades ago, whether you believe me or not.
That was to ChristRosie the sinless sinner christian.
Also, it may be that you don't put it into practice because it is
inherent and you can't be any other way. Of course a man can think any
number of ways, but where the rubber meets the road, the bottom line,
his action is faith (leaning not on one's own understanding).
His action is evidence and validation of his faith. Faith comes by
hearing, and hearing by the word of God (Romans 1:16; 10:17; John
20:30-31; 1 Corinthians 15:1-4). So you get faith from God's word. You
evidence faith by what you do.
Post by RobertPost by In the Name of JesusOne cannot
be in God and be your own Lord at any point.
Then stop denying that you retain a sin nature and should confess your
sins to God every day
“Pray then like this: “Our Father in heaven, hallowed be your name. Your
kingdom come, your will be done, on earth as it is in heaven. Give us
this day our daily bread, and forgive us our debts, as we also have
forgiven our debtors.” (Matthew 6:9–12, ESV)
“If we say we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in
us. If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our
sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness. If we say we have not
sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is not in us.” (1 John 1:8–10, ESV)
[...]
------------------
Source
McGee, J.V. (1991) Thru the Bible commentary: Ephesians. electronic ed.
Nashville: Thomas Nelson.
--
Have you heard the good news Christ died for our sins (†), and God
raised Him from the dead?
That Christ died for our sins shows we're sinners who deserve the death
penalty. That God raised Him from the dead shows Christ's death
satisfied God's righteous demands against our sin (Romans 3:25; 1 John
2:1-2). This means God can now remain just, while forgiving you of your
sins, and saving you from eternal damnation.
On the basis of Christ's death and resurrection for our sins, call on
the name of the Lord to save you: "For 'everyone who calls on the name
of the Lord will be saved.'" (Romans 10:13, ESV)
https://christrose.news/salvation