Discussion:
Should be telling the kids there's no Jesus?
Add Reply
----------- A t h e i s t ------------
2019-09-28 14:12:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
A conjecture, also called a belief, has no proof burden.
Every truth claim has burden of proof and we atheists know exactly
why you Christians are desperate to escape burden of proof: you
have _no_ evidence, none, of your god and your god apparently has
chosen to remain perpetually hidden up your ass.
--
There is no verifiable evidence of any god(s). None whatsoever.
Christian: a person afraid of a perpetually hiding [imaginary] god.
Extortion (Believe or Burn) is _THE_ foundation of Christianity.
d***@cox.net
2019-09-29 13:50:21 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sat, 28 Sep 2019 07:12:39 -0700, ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
A conjecture, also called a belief, has no proof burden.
Nor does the counter argument. This is exactly why we Roman Catholics profess
"we believe..........."
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
Every truth claim has burden of proof and we atheists know exactly
why you Christians are desperate to escape burden of proof: you
have _no_ evidence,
But we DO have evidence that guides us to belief - creation of all things in
existence. For instance, the universe started off as nothing in nothing. Then,
in a flash, a "singularity" appeared in nothingness and exploded outward for
13.8 billion years to its current size. Can we say for sure that's the way it
happened, no, but we have high assurance supported by science.
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
none, of your god and your god apparently has
chosen to remain perpetually hidden up your ass.
God is not man, but spirit. And we believe that too.

God became flesh in Jesus Christ 2000 years ago to bring us his new way. So if
you have something contrary to add, please do so.


the dukester
----------- A t h e i s t ------------
2019-10-04 17:29:27 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
Every truth claim has burden of proof and we atheists know exactly
why you Christians are desperate to escape burden of proof: you
have _no_ evidence,
But we DO have evidence - creation of all things in existence.
You have no evidence of "creation" or "creator", and there are far
more plausible possible explanations than your imaginary god/Jesus.
For instance, the universe started off as nothing in nothing.
You have no evidence of that.
Then,
in a flash, a "singularity" appeared in nothingness
You have no evidence of that.
we have high assurance supported by science.
Science does not support a god claim, BUT sometimes lack of evidence
is itself evidence, and given how long humans have strained to find
the slightest bit of evidence of a god, this qualifies as strong
evidence that the Christian god is only, like all the others, imaginary.
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
your god apparently has
chosen to remain perpetually hidden up your ass.
God is not man, but spirit.
Well then your spirit god remains perpetually hidden up your ass.
God became flesh in Jesus Christ 2000 years ago to bring us
his new way.
If the OT god was a fuck up then so is your NT god.
--
There is no verifiable evidence of any god(s). None whatsoever.
Christian: a person afraid of a perpetually hiding [imaginary] god.
Extortion (Believe or Burn) is _THE_ foundation of Christianity.
d***@cox.net
2019-10-04 18:43:36 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Fri, 04 Oct 2019 10:29:27 -0700, ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
Every truth claim has burden of proof and we atheists know exactly
why you Christians are desperate to escape burden of proof: you
have _no_ evidence,
But we DO have evidence - creation of all things in existence.
You have no evidence of "creation" or "creator", and there are far
more plausible possible explanations than your imaginary god/Jesus.
But I do.
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
For instance, the universe started off as nothing in nothing.
You have no evidence of that.
Where do you think the beginning 13.8 billion years comes from?
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
Then,
in a flash, a "singularity" appeared in nothingness
You have no evidence of that.
Expansion is clearly evident. A good computer man can reverse that expandion at
the speed of light to a big crunch to get back to a single point
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
we have high assurance supported by science.
Science does not support a god claim,
But creation does.


the dukester
----------- A t h e i s t ------------
2019-10-04 19:22:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
Every truth claim has burden of proof and we atheists know exactly
why you Christians are desperate to escape burden of proof: you
have _no_ evidence,
But we DO have evidence - creation of all things in existence.
You have no evidence of "creation" or "creator", and there are far
more plausible possible explanations than your imaginary god/Jesus.
But I do.
All you have is "Look!, a tree; that proves my god exists".
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
For instance, the universe started off as nothing in nothing.
You have no evidence of that.
Where do you think the beginning 13.8 billion years comes from?
You have no evidence of "started", "nothing in nothing", or "beginning".

You pull bullshit from your ass where your god perpetually hides itself.
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
Then,
in a flash, a "singularity" appeared in nothingness
You have no evidence of that.
Expansion is clearly evident.
You have no evidence of "in a flash" or "nothingness"; you just
pull shit out yer ass where your god perpetually hides itself.
--
There is no verifiable evidence of any god(s). None whatsoever.
Christian: a person afraid of a perpetually hiding [imaginary] god.
Extortion (Believe or Burn) is _THE_ foundation of Christianity.
d***@cox.net
2019-10-06 22:53:29 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Fri, 04 Oct 2019 12:22:51 -0700, ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
Every truth claim has burden of proof and we atheists know exactly
why you Christians are desperate to escape burden of proof: you
have _no_ evidence,
But we DO have evidence - creation of all things in existence.
You have no evidence of "creation" or "creator", and there are far
more plausible possible explanations than your imaginary god/Jesus.
But I do.
All you have is "Look!, a tree; that proves my god exists".
Creation of all things proves it.
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
For instance, the universe started off as nothing in nothing.
You have no evidence of that.
Where do you think the beginning 13.8 billion years comes from?
You have no evidence of "started", "nothing in nothing", or "beginning".
You pull bullshit from your ass where your god perpetually hides itself.
But it's been expanding for 13.8 billion years now, ie, flying apart at the
speed of light.
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
Then,
in a flash, a "singularity" appeared in nothingness
You have no evidence of that.
Expansion is clearly evident.
You have no evidence of "in a flash" or "nothingness"; you just
pull shit out yer ass where your god perpetually hides itself.
But if you reverse the expansion in a big crunch
instantaneously for 13.8 billion years, you end up with a point existing in
nothing.

Good grief but I am so intelligent.

the dukester
----------- A t h e i s t ------------
2019-10-04 19:24:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
Post by d***@cox.net
we have high assurance supported by science.
Science does not support a god claim,
But creation does.
No evidence of either "creation" or "creator"; that's bullshit you
pulled from your ass where your god perpetually hides itself.
--
There is no verifiable evidence of any god(s). None whatsoever.
Christian: a person afraid of a perpetually hiding [imaginary] god.
Extortion (Believe or Burn) is _THE_ foundation of Christianity.
Attila
2019-10-04 19:30:12 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by d***@cox.net
On Fri, 04 Oct 2019 10:29:27 -0700, ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
Every truth claim has burden of proof and we atheists know exactly
why you Christians are desperate to escape burden of proof: you
have _no_ evidence,
But we DO have evidence - creation of all things in existence.
You have no evidence of "creation" or "creator", and there are far
more plausible possible explanations than your imaginary god/Jesus.
But I do.
So you constantly claim but the only evidence you can present is so
ambiguous as to be useless. Just because you think something is
sufficient evidence does not mean anyone else would agree.
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
For instance, the universe started off as nothing in nothing.
You have no evidence of that.
Where do you think the beginning 13.8 billion years comes from?
There is no evidence that it started out as nothing.
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
Then,
in a flash, a "singularity" appeared in nothingness
You have no evidence of that.
Expansion is clearly evident. A good computer man can reverse that expandion at
the speed of light to a big crunch to get back to a single point
Which only means you have located a single point. Nothing more.
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
we have high assurance supported by science.
Science does not support a god claim,
But creation does.
No, it doesn't.
Post by d***@cox.net
the dukester
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

I totally support the Freedom of Choice.
I oppose any public mention, display, or support of religion.

I am not conservative so much as I despise insane liberals.

National Socialist American Worker's Party
formally known as the Democratic Party.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.

Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.
d***@cox.net
2019-10-06 22:55:30 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Attila
Post by d***@cox.net
On Fri, 04 Oct 2019 10:29:27 -0700, ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
Every truth claim has burden of proof and we atheists know exactly
why you Christians are desperate to escape burden of proof: you
have _no_ evidence,
But we DO have evidence - creation of all things in existence.
You have no evidence of "creation" or "creator", and there are far
more plausible possible explanations than your imaginary god/Jesus.
But I do.
So you constantly claim but the only evidence you can present is so
ambiguous as to be useless. Just because you think something is
sufficient evidence does not mean anyone else would agree.
Well, I am just that intelligent and you are just that stupid.
Post by Attila
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
For instance, the universe started off as nothing in nothing.
You have no evidence of that.
Where do you think the beginning 13.8 billion years comes from?
There is no evidence that it started out as nothing.
Well, not in the vacuum space you call a skull.
Post by Attila
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
Then,
in a flash, a "singularity" appeared in nothingness
You have no evidence of that.
Expansion is clearly evident. A good computer man can reverse that expandion at
the speed of light to a big crunch to get back to a single point
Which only means you have located a single point. Nothing more.
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
we have high assurance supported by science.
Science does not support a god claim,
But creation does.
No, it doesn't.
Post by d***@cox.net
the dukester
the dukester
Attila
2019-10-07 02:05:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Attila
Post by d***@cox.net
On Fri, 04 Oct 2019 10:29:27 -0700, ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
Every truth claim has burden of proof and we atheists know exactly
why you Christians are desperate to escape burden of proof: you
have _no_ evidence,
But we DO have evidence - creation of all things in existence.
You have no evidence of "creation" or "creator", and there are far
more plausible possible explanations than your imaginary god/Jesus.
But I do.
So you constantly claim but the only evidence you can present is so
ambiguous as to be useless. Just because you think something is
sufficient evidence does not mean anyone else would agree.
Well, I am just that intelligent and you are just that stupid.
I am sure you think so. I wonder if you have found anyone else who
would agree.
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Attila
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
For instance, the universe started off as nothing in nothing.
You have no evidence of that.
Where do you think the beginning 13.8 billion years comes from?
There is no evidence that it started out as nothing.
Well, not in the vacuum space you call a skull.
There is no evidence it started in a vacuum either.
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Attila
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
Then,
in a flash, a "singularity" appeared in nothingness
You have no evidence of that.
Expansion is clearly evident. A good computer man can reverse that expandion at
the speed of light to a big crunch to get back to a single point
Which only means you have located a single point. Nothing more.
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
we have high assurance supported by science.
Science does not support a god claim,
But creation does.
No, it doesn't.
Post by d***@cox.net
the dukester
the dukester
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

I totally support the Freedom of Choice.
I oppose any public mention, display, or support of religion.

I am not conservative so much as I despise insane liberals.

National Socialist American Worker's Party
formally known as the Democratic Party.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.

Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.
d***@cox.net
2019-10-11 22:17:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Attila
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Attila
Post by d***@cox.net
On Fri, 04 Oct 2019 10:29:27 -0700, ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
Every truth claim has burden of proof and we atheists know exactly
why you Christians are desperate to escape burden of proof: you
have _no_ evidence,
But we DO have evidence - creation of all things in existence.
You have no evidence of "creation" or "creator", and there are far
more plausible possible explanations than your imaginary god/Jesus.
But I do.
So you constantly claim but the only evidence you can present is so
ambiguous as to be useless. Just because you think something is
sufficient evidence does not mean anyone else would agree.
Well, I am just that intelligent and you are just that stupid.
I am sure you think so. I wonder if you have found anyone else who
would agree.
Creation is certified true.
Post by Attila
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Attila
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
For instance, the universe started off as nothing in nothing.
You have no evidence of that.
Where do you think the beginning 13.8 billion years comes from?
There is no evidence that it started out as nothing.
Well, not in the vacuum space you call a skull.
There is no evidence it started in a vacuum either.
There was no "anything" for the singularity to appear in.
Post by Attila
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Attila
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
Then,
in a flash, a "singularity" appeared in nothingness
You have no evidence of that.
Expansion is clearly evident. A good computer man can reverse that expandion at
the speed of light to a big crunch to get back to a single point
Which only means you have located a single point. Nothing more.
But no volume to appear in.
Post by Attila
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Attila
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
we have high assurance supported by science.
Science does not support a god claim,
But creation does.
No, it doesn't.
Yep.

the dukester
Attila
2019-10-12 02:08:28 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Attila
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Attila
Post by d***@cox.net
On Fri, 04 Oct 2019 10:29:27 -0700, ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
Every truth claim has burden of proof and we atheists know exactly
why you Christians are desperate to escape burden of proof: you
have _no_ evidence,
But we DO have evidence - creation of all things in existence.
You have no evidence of "creation" or "creator", and there are far
more plausible possible explanations than your imaginary god/Jesus.
But I do.
So you constantly claim but the only evidence you can present is so
ambiguous as to be useless. Just because you think something is
sufficient evidence does not mean anyone else would agree.
Well, I am just that intelligent and you are just that stupid.
I am sure you think so. I wonder if you have found anyone else who
would agree.
Creation is certified true.
Certified by who? Where? What are their qualifications to certify
anything?
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Attila
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Attila
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
For instance, the universe started off as nothing in nothing.
You have no evidence of that.
Where do you think the beginning 13.8 billion years comes from?
There is no evidence that it started out as nothing.
Well, not in the vacuum space you call a skull.
There is no evidence it started in a vacuum either.
There was no "anything" for the singularity to appear in.
How do you know this? Were you there?
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Attila
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Attila
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
Then,
in a flash, a "singularity" appeared in nothingness
You have no evidence of that.
Expansion is clearly evident. A good computer man can reverse that expandion at
the speed of light to a big crunch to get back to a single point
Which only means you have located a single point. Nothing more.
But no volume to appear in.
Perhaps no volume is necessary.
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Attila
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by Attila
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
we have high assurance supported by science.
Science does not support a god claim,
But creation does.
No, it doesn't.
Yep.
Supporting evidence?
Post by d***@cox.net
the dukester
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

I totally support the Freedom of Choice.
I oppose any public mention, display, or support of religion.

I am not conservative so much as I despise insane liberals.

National Socialist American Worker's Party
formally known as the Democratic Party.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.

Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.
----------- A t h e i s t ------------
2019-10-07 22:14:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by d***@cox.net
we have high assurance supported by science.
Science does not support a god claim, BUT sometimes lack of evidence
is itself evidence, and given how long humans have strained to find
the slightest bit of evidence of a god, this qualifies as strong
evidence that the Christian god is only, like all the others, imaginary.
--
If the Bible OT god was a fuckup then so is the New Testament god.
Siri Cruise
2019-10-08 09:36:35 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
Science does not support a god claim, BUT sometimes lack of evidence
is itself evidence
Bullshit.
--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The first law of discordiamism: The more energy This post / \
to make order is nore energy made into entropy. insults Islam. Mohammed
Attila
2019-10-08 11:50:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Tue, 08 Oct 2019 02:36:35 -0700, Siri Cruise <***@yahoo.com>
in alt.atheism with message-id
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
Science does not support a god claim, BUT sometimes lack of evidence
is itself evidence
Bullshit.
It may serve as a working hypothesis.

Absence of proof that something exists does not suggest that it does
exist
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

I totally support the Freedom of Choice.
I oppose any public mention, display, or support of religion.

I am not conservative so much as I despise insane liberals.

National Socialist American Worker's Party
formally known as the Democratic Party.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.

Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.
Siri Cruise
2019-10-08 12:36:27 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Attila
in alt.atheism with message-id
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
Science does not support a god claim, BUT sometimes lack of evidence
is itself evidence
Bullshit.
It may serve as a working hypothesis.
'Working hypothesis' is a fancy way to say 'guessing'.
Post by Attila
Absence of proof that something exists does not suggest that it does
exist
The Trojan War and Illiad support my working hypothesis Eris is real.
--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The first law of discordiamism: The more energy This post / \
to make order is nore energy made into entropy. insults Islam. Mohammed
Attila
2019-10-08 21:52:24 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Tue, 08 Oct 2019 05:36:27 -0700, Siri Cruise <***@yahoo.com>
in alt.atheism with message-id
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by Attila
in alt.atheism with message-id
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
Science does not support a god claim, BUT sometimes lack of evidence
is itself evidence
Bullshit.
It may serve as a working hypothesis.
'Working hypothesis' is a fancy way to say 'guessing'.
No, it is a reasonable basis for predictions. It is used in science
as a proven tool.
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by Attila
Absence of proof that something exists does not suggest that it does
exist
The Trojan War and Illiad support my working hypothesis Eris is real.
The next step is to test that hypothesis. Have you done so?
--
Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting and abhorrent.
Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.

I totally support the Freedom of Choice.
I oppose any public mention, display, or support of religion.

I am not conservative so much as I despise insane liberals.

National Socialist American Worker's Party
formally known as the Democratic Party.

Every illegal alien is a criminal.

Don't build a wall, build a kill zone.
----------- A t h e i s t ------------
2019-10-09 13:09:25 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
Science does not support a god claim, BUT sometimes lack of evidence
is itself evidence
Bullshit.
Yet you can't produce a shred of evidence for your [imaginary'] god.
--
There is no verifiable evidence of any god(s). None whatsoever.
Christian: a person afraid of a perpetually hiding [imaginary] god.
Extortion (Believe or Burn) is _THE_ foundation of Christianity.
Siri Cruise
2019-10-09 15:02:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
Post by Siri Cruise
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
Science does not support a god claim, BUT sometimes lack of evidence
is itself evidence
Bullshit.
Yet you can't produce a shred of evidence for your [imaginary'] god.
You clowns retreat into dogma when logic and rationality cannot be twisted to
your beliefs. Just learn to say 'I don't know.'
--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The first law of discordiamism: The more energy This post / \
to make order is nore energy made into entropy. insults Islam. Mohammed
d***@cox.net
2019-10-11 22:18:21 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Mon, 07 Oct 2019 15:14:40 -0700, ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
Post by d***@cox.net
we have high assurance supported by science.
Science does not support a god claim, BUT sometimes lack of evidence
is itself evidence, and given how long humans have strained to find
the slightest bit of evidence of a god, this qualifies as strong
evidence that the Christian god is only, like all the others, imaginary.
Your problem, not mine.

the dukester
Ted
2019-10-12 23:32:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by d***@cox.net
On Mon, 07 Oct 2019 15:14:40 -0700, ----------- A t h e i s t
------------
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
Post by d***@cox.net
we have high assurance supported by science.
Science does not support a god claim, BUT sometimes lack of
evidence
Post by d***@cox.net
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
is itself evidence, and given how long humans have strained to find
the slightest bit of evidence of a god, this qualifies as strong
evidence that the Christian god is only, like all the others,
imaginary.
Post by d***@cox.net
Your problem, not mine.
the dukester
Can you prove that Odin doesn't exist?
Siri Cruise
2019-10-13 05:24:11 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Ted
Can you prove that Odin doesn't exist?
Hence Asatru.
--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The first law of discordiamism: The more energy This post / \
to make order is nore energy made into entropy. insults Islam. Mohammed
p***@gmail.com
2019-10-09 17:16:12 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by d***@cox.net
On Sat, 28 Sep 2019 07:12:39 -0700, ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
A conjecture, also called a belief, has no proof burden.
Nor does the counter argument. This is exactly why we Roman Catholics profess
"we believe..........."
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
Every truth claim has burden of proof and we atheists know exactly
why you Christians are desperate to escape burden of proof: you
have _no_ evidence,
But we DO have evidence that guides us to belief - creation of all things in
existence. For instance, the universe started off as nothing in nothing. Then,
in a flash, a "singularity" appeared in nothingness and exploded outward for
13.8 billion years to its current size. Can we say for sure that's the way it
happened, no, but we have high assurance supported by science.
Post by ----------- A t h e i s t ------------
none, of your god and your god apparently has
chosen to remain perpetually hidden up your ass.
God is not man, but spirit. And we believe that too.
God became flesh in Jesus Christ 2000 years ago to bring us his new way. So if
you have something contrary to add, please do so.
the dukester
hogwash ... gods are created in the imaginations of man and believed by fools.
Loading...